Exploring reasons for variation in ordering thyroid function tests in primary care: a qualitative study

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/11287/593805
Title:
Exploring reasons for variation in ordering thyroid function tests in primary care: a qualitative study
Authors:
Hardwick, R.; Heaton, J.; Griffiths, G.; Vaidya, Bijay; Child, S.; Fleming, S.; Hamilton, W. T.; Tomlinson, J.; Zhelev, Z.; Patterson, A.; Hyde, C.
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: The ordering of thyroid function tests (TFTs) is increasing but there is not a similar increase in thyroid disorders in the general population, leading some to query whether inappropriate testing is taking place. Inconsistent clinical practice is thought to be a cause of this, but there is little evidence of the views of general practitioners, practice nurses or practice managers on the reasons for variation in the ordering of TFTs. AIM: To find out the reasons for variation in ordering of TFTs from the perspective of primary healthcare professionals Methods: Fifteen semi-structured interviews were carried out with primary healthcare professionals (general practitioners, practice nurses, practice managers) that used one laboratory of a general hospital in South West England for TFTs. Framework Analysis was used to analyse views on test ordering variation at the societal, practice, individual practitioner and patient level. RESULTS: A number of reasons for variation in ordering across practices were suggested. These related to: primary healthcare professionals awareness of and adherence to national policy changes; practices having different protocols on TFTs ordering; the set-up and use of computer systems in practices; the range of practice healthcare professionals able to order TFTs; greater risk-aversion amongst general practitioners and changes in their training and finally how primary healthcare staff responded to patients who were perceived to seek help more readily than in the past. CONCLUSION: The reasons for variation in TFTs ordering are complex and interdependent. Interventions to reduce variation in TFTs ordering need to consider multiple behavioural and contextual factors to be most effective.
Citation:
Qual Prim Care. 2014;22(6):256-61.
Publisher:
Ingenta
Journal:
Quality in primary care
Issue Date:
1-Dec-2014
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/11287/593805
PubMed ID:
25887650
Additional Links:
http://openurl.ingenta.com/content/nlm?genre=article&issn=1479-1072&volume=22&issue=6&spage=256&aulast=Hardwick
Type:
Journal Article
Language:
eng
ISSN:
1479-1072
Appears in Collections:
2014 RD&E publications; Diabetes/Endocrine Services

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorHardwick, R.en
dc.contributor.authorHeaton, J.en
dc.contributor.authorGriffiths, G.en
dc.contributor.authorVaidya, Bijayen
dc.contributor.authorChild, S.en
dc.contributor.authorFleming, S.en
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, W. T.en
dc.contributor.authorTomlinson, J.en
dc.contributor.authorZhelev, Z.en
dc.contributor.authorPatterson, A.en
dc.contributor.authorHyde, C.en
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-19T12:35:08Zen
dc.date.available2016-01-19T12:35:08Zen
dc.date.issued2014-12-01en
dc.identifier.citationQual Prim Care. 2014;22(6):256-61.en
dc.identifier.issn1479-1072en
dc.identifier.pmid25887650en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11287/593805en
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The ordering of thyroid function tests (TFTs) is increasing but there is not a similar increase in thyroid disorders in the general population, leading some to query whether inappropriate testing is taking place. Inconsistent clinical practice is thought to be a cause of this, but there is little evidence of the views of general practitioners, practice nurses or practice managers on the reasons for variation in the ordering of TFTs. AIM: To find out the reasons for variation in ordering of TFTs from the perspective of primary healthcare professionals Methods: Fifteen semi-structured interviews were carried out with primary healthcare professionals (general practitioners, practice nurses, practice managers) that used one laboratory of a general hospital in South West England for TFTs. Framework Analysis was used to analyse views on test ordering variation at the societal, practice, individual practitioner and patient level. RESULTS: A number of reasons for variation in ordering across practices were suggested. These related to: primary healthcare professionals awareness of and adherence to national policy changes; practices having different protocols on TFTs ordering; the set-up and use of computer systems in practices; the range of practice healthcare professionals able to order TFTs; greater risk-aversion amongst general practitioners and changes in their training and finally how primary healthcare staff responded to patients who were perceived to seek help more readily than in the past. CONCLUSION: The reasons for variation in TFTs ordering are complex and interdependent. Interventions to reduce variation in TFTs ordering need to consider multiple behavioural and contextual factors to be most effective.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherIngentaen
dc.relation.urlhttp://openurl.ingenta.com/content/nlm?genre=article&issn=1479-1072&volume=22&issue=6&spage=256&aulast=Hardwicken
dc.titleExploring reasons for variation in ordering thyroid function tests in primary care: a qualitative studyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journalQuality in primary careen

Related articles on PubMed

All Items in RD&E Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.