Robotic technology results in faster and more robust surgical skill acquisition than traditional laparoscopy

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/11287/593939
Title:
Robotic technology results in faster and more robust surgical skill acquisition than traditional laparoscopy
Authors:
Moore, L. J.; Wilson, M R.; Waine, Elizabeth; Masters, R. S.; McGrath, John S; Vine, S. J.
Abstract:
Technical surgical skills are said to be acquired quicker on a robotic rather than laparoscopic platform. However, research examining this proposition is scarce. Thus, this study aimed to compare the performance and learning curves of novices acquiring skills using a robotic or laparoscopic system, and to examine if any learning advantages were maintained over time and transferred to more difficult and stressful tasks. Forty novice participants were randomly assigned to either a robotic- or laparoscopic-trained group. Following one baseline trial on a ball pick-and-drop task, participants performed 50 learning trials. Participants then completed an immediate retention trial and a transfer trial on a two-instrument rope-threading task. One month later, participants performed a delayed retention trial and a stressful multi-tasking trial. The results revealed that the robotic-trained group completed the ball pick-and-drop task more quickly and accurately than the laparoscopic-trained group across baseline, immediate retention, and delayed retention trials. Furthermore, the robotic-trained group displayed a shorter learning curve for accuracy. The robotic-trained group also performed the more complex rope-threading and stressful multi-tasking transfer trials better. Finally, in the multi-tasking trial, the robotic-trained group made fewer tone counting errors. The results highlight the benefits of using robotic technology for the acquisition of technical surgical skills.
Citation:
J Robot Surg. 2015 Mar;9(1):67-73. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
Publisher:
Springer
Journal:
Journal of robotic surgery
Issue Date:
1-Mar-2015
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/11287/593939
DOI:
10.1007/s11701-014-0493-9
PubMed ID:
26530974
Additional Links:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-014-0493-9
Type:
Journal Article
Language:
eng
ISSN:
1863-2491
Appears in Collections:
2015 RD&E publications; HeSRU publications

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorMoore, L. J.en
dc.contributor.authorWilson, M R.en
dc.contributor.authorWaine, Elizabethen
dc.contributor.authorMasters, R. S.en
dc.contributor.authorMcGrath, John Sen
dc.contributor.authorVine, S. J.en
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-19T12:37:39Zen
dc.date.available2016-01-19T12:37:39Zen
dc.date.issued2015-03-01en
dc.identifier.citationJ Robot Surg. 2015 Mar;9(1):67-73. Epub 2014 Dec 24.en
dc.identifier.issn1863-2491en
dc.identifier.pmid26530974en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11701-014-0493-9en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11287/593939en
dc.description.abstractTechnical surgical skills are said to be acquired quicker on a robotic rather than laparoscopic platform. However, research examining this proposition is scarce. Thus, this study aimed to compare the performance and learning curves of novices acquiring skills using a robotic or laparoscopic system, and to examine if any learning advantages were maintained over time and transferred to more difficult and stressful tasks. Forty novice participants were randomly assigned to either a robotic- or laparoscopic-trained group. Following one baseline trial on a ball pick-and-drop task, participants performed 50 learning trials. Participants then completed an immediate retention trial and a transfer trial on a two-instrument rope-threading task. One month later, participants performed a delayed retention trial and a stressful multi-tasking trial. The results revealed that the robotic-trained group completed the ball pick-and-drop task more quickly and accurately than the laparoscopic-trained group across baseline, immediate retention, and delayed retention trials. Furthermore, the robotic-trained group displayed a shorter learning curve for accuracy. The robotic-trained group also performed the more complex rope-threading and stressful multi-tasking transfer trials better. Finally, in the multi-tasking trial, the robotic-trained group made fewer tone counting errors. The results highlight the benefits of using robotic technology for the acquisition of technical surgical skills.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-014-0493-9en
dc.titleRobotic technology results in faster and more robust surgical skill acquisition than traditional laparoscopyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journalJournal of robotic surgeryen

Related articles on PubMed

All Items in RD&E Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.