Assessing visual control during simulated and live operations: gathering evidence for the content validity of simulation using eye movement metrics.

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/11287/596698
Title:
Assessing visual control during simulated and live operations: gathering evidence for the content validity of simulation using eye movement metrics.
Authors:
Vine, S J; McGrath, John S; Bright, Elizabeth; Dutton, Thomas; Clark, James; Wilson, M R
Abstract:
Although virtual reality (VR) simulators serve an important role in the training and assessment of surgeons, they need to be evaluated for evidence of validity. Eye-tracking technology and measures of visual control have been used as an adjunct to the performance parameters produced by VR simulators to help in objectively establishing the construct validity (experts vs. novices) of VR simulators. However, determining the extent to which VR simulators represent the real procedure and environment (content validity) has largely been a subjective process undertaken by experienced surgeons. This study aimed to examine the content validity of a VR transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) simulator by comparing visual control metrics taken during simulated and real TURP procedures.
Citation:
Assessing visual control during simulated and live operations: gathering evidence for the content validity of simulation using eye movement metrics. 2014, 28 (6):1788-93 Surg Endosc
Publisher:
Springer
Journal:
Surgical endoscopy
Issue Date:
Jun-2014
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/11287/596698
DOI:
10.1007/s00464-013-3387-4
PubMed ID:
24414457
Additional Links:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3387-4
Type:
Journal Article; Evaluation Studies; Validation Studies
Language:
en
ISSN:
1432-2218
Appears in Collections:
2014 RD&E publications; HeSRU publications

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorVine, S Jen
dc.contributor.authorMcGrath, John Sen
dc.contributor.authorBright, Elizabethen
dc.contributor.authorDutton, Thomasen
dc.contributor.authorClark, Jamesen
dc.contributor.authorWilson, M Ren
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-18T16:40:47Zen
dc.date.available2016-02-18T16:40:47Zen
dc.date.issued2014-06en
dc.identifier.citationAssessing visual control during simulated and live operations: gathering evidence for the content validity of simulation using eye movement metrics. 2014, 28 (6):1788-93 Surg Endoscen
dc.identifier.issn1432-2218en
dc.identifier.pmid24414457en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00464-013-3387-4en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11287/596698en
dc.description.abstractAlthough virtual reality (VR) simulators serve an important role in the training and assessment of surgeons, they need to be evaluated for evidence of validity. Eye-tracking technology and measures of visual control have been used as an adjunct to the performance parameters produced by VR simulators to help in objectively establishing the construct validity (experts vs. novices) of VR simulators. However, determining the extent to which VR simulators represent the real procedure and environment (content validity) has largely been a subjective process undertaken by experienced surgeons. This study aimed to examine the content validity of a VR transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) simulator by comparing visual control metrics taken during simulated and real TURP procedures.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3387-4en
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to Surgical endoscopyen
dc.subjectWessex Classification Subject Headings::Surgeryen
dc.titleAssessing visual control during simulated and live operations: gathering evidence for the content validity of simulation using eye movement metrics.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.typeEvaluation Studiesen
dc.typeValidation Studiesen
dc.identifier.journalSurgical endoscopyen
dc.type.versionPublisheden

Related articles on PubMed

All Items in RD&E Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.