Synthetic or biological mesh use in laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy--a systematic review.

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/11287/615714
Title:
Synthetic or biological mesh use in laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy--a systematic review.
Authors:
Smart, Neil J. ( 0000-0002-3043-8324 ) ; Pathak, S.; Boorman, Patrica A.; Daniels, Ian R. ( 0000-0002-9114-0812 )
Abstract:
Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) is a surgical option for internal and external rectal prolapse with low perioperative morbidity and low recurrence rates. Use of synthetic mesh in the pelvis may be associated with complications such as fistulation, erosion and dyspareunia. Biological meshes may avoid these complications, but the long-term outcome is uncertain. Debate continues as to which type of mesh is optimal for laparoscopic VMR.
Citation:
Synthetic or biological mesh use in laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy--a systematic review. 2013, 15 (6):650-4 Colorectal Dis
Publisher:
Wiley
Journal:
Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland
Issue Date:
Jun-2013
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/11287/615714
DOI:
10.1111/codi.12219
PubMed ID:
23517144
Additional Links:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/codi.12219/abstract
Note:
This article is freely available via Open Access. Click on the 'Additional Link' above to access the full-text from the publisher's site.
Type:
Systematic review
Language:
en
ISSN:
1463-1318
Appears in Collections:
Colorectal Surgery; pre-2014 RD&E publications

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorSmart, Neil J.en
dc.contributor.authorPathak, S.en
dc.contributor.authorBoorman, Patrica A.en
dc.contributor.authorDaniels, Ian R.en
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-07T14:50:14Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-07T14:50:14Z-
dc.date.issued2013-06-
dc.identifier.citationSynthetic or biological mesh use in laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy--a systematic review. 2013, 15 (6):650-4 Colorectal Disen
dc.identifier.issn1463-1318-
dc.identifier.pmid23517144-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/codi.12219-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11287/615714-
dc.description.abstractLaparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) is a surgical option for internal and external rectal prolapse with low perioperative morbidity and low recurrence rates. Use of synthetic mesh in the pelvis may be associated with complications such as fistulation, erosion and dyspareunia. Biological meshes may avoid these complications, but the long-term outcome is uncertain. Debate continues as to which type of mesh is optimal for laparoscopic VMR.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWileyen
dc.relation.urlhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/codi.12219/abstracten
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Irelanden
dc.subjectWessex Classification Subject Headings::Gastroenterologyen
dc.titleSynthetic or biological mesh use in laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy--a systematic review.en
dc.typeSystematic reviewen
dc.identifier.journalColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Irelanden
dc.description.noteThis article is freely available via Open Access. Click on the 'Additional Link' above to access the full-text from the publisher's site.en
dc.type.versionPublisheden

Related articles on PubMed

All Items in RD&E Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.