Comparison of two nasoalveolar molding techniques in unilateral complete cleft lip patients: a randomized, prospective, single-blind trial to compare nasal outcomes.

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/11287/618100
Title:
Comparison of two nasoalveolar molding techniques in unilateral complete cleft lip patients: a randomized, prospective, single-blind trial to compare nasal outcomes.
Authors:
Chang, C-S; Wallace, Christopher G ( 0000-0003-1897-9520 ) ; Pai, Betty C-J; Chiu, Y-T; Hsieh, Y-J; Chen, I-J; Liao, Y-F; Liou, E J-W; Chen, P K-T
Abstract:
Nasoalveolar molding became increasingly popular in the 1990s as a means of easing surgery and improving nasal outcomes for cleft lip repairs. In the late 1990s, three orthodontists from our center underwent nasoalveolar molding training: two at the Rush Craniofacial Center, in Chicago; and one at New York University Craniofacial Center. They brought two different nasoalveolar molding techniques back to Chang Gung Craniofacial Center: the modified Figueroa and the modified Grayson techniques. Outcomes following use of these techniques have not previously been compared prospectively.
Citation:
Comparison of two nasoalveolar molding techniques in unilateral complete cleft lip patients: a randomized, prospective, single-blind trial to compare nasal outcomes. 2014, 134 (2):275-82 Plast. Reconstr. Surg.
Publisher:
Wolters Kluwer
Journal:
Plastic and reconstructive surgery
Issue Date:
Aug-2014
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/11287/618100
DOI:
10.1097/PRS.0000000000000361
PubMed ID:
24732649
Additional Links:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000361
Type:
Journal Article; Comparative Study; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Language:
en
ISSN:
1529-4242
Appears in Collections:
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery; 2014 RD&E publications

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorChang, C-Sen
dc.contributor.authorWallace, Christopher Gen
dc.contributor.authorPai, Betty C-Jen
dc.contributor.authorChiu, Y-Ten
dc.contributor.authorHsieh, Y-Jen
dc.contributor.authorChen, I-Jen
dc.contributor.authorLiao, Y-Fen
dc.contributor.authorLiou, E J-Wen
dc.contributor.authorChen, P K-Ten
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-09T10:36:10Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-09T10:36:10Z-
dc.date.issued2014-08-
dc.identifier.citationComparison of two nasoalveolar molding techniques in unilateral complete cleft lip patients: a randomized, prospective, single-blind trial to compare nasal outcomes. 2014, 134 (2):275-82 Plast. Reconstr. Surg.en
dc.identifier.issn1529-4242-
dc.identifier.pmid24732649-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/PRS.0000000000000361-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11287/618100-
dc.description.abstractNasoalveolar molding became increasingly popular in the 1990s as a means of easing surgery and improving nasal outcomes for cleft lip repairs. In the late 1990s, three orthodontists from our center underwent nasoalveolar molding training: two at the Rush Craniofacial Center, in Chicago; and one at New York University Craniofacial Center. They brought two different nasoalveolar molding techniques back to Chang Gung Craniofacial Center: the modified Figueroa and the modified Grayson techniques. Outcomes following use of these techniques have not previously been compared prospectively.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWolters Kluweren
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000361en
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to Plastic and reconstructive surgeryen
dc.subjectWessex Classification Subject Headings::Surgery::Plastic surgeryen
dc.titleComparison of two nasoalveolar molding techniques in unilateral complete cleft lip patients: a randomized, prospective, single-blind trial to compare nasal outcomes.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.typeComparative Studyen
dc.typeRandomized Controlled Trialen
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'ten
dc.identifier.journalPlastic and reconstructive surgeryen
dc.type.versionPublisheden

Related articles on PubMed

All Items in RD&E Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.