Outcome of kinematic alignment using patient-specific instrumentation versus mechanical alignment in TKA: a meta-analysis and subgroup analysis of randomised trials.

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/11287/620759
Title:
Outcome of kinematic alignment using patient-specific instrumentation versus mechanical alignment in TKA: a meta-analysis and subgroup analysis of randomised trials.
Authors:
Woon, J T K; Zeng, I S L; Calliess, T; Windhagen, H; Ettinger, M; Waterson, Hugh B.; Toms, Andrew; Young, S W
Abstract:
Kinematic alignment (KA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) matches component position to the pre-arthritic anatomy of an individual patient, with the aim of improving functional outcomes. Recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing KA to traditional neutral mechanical alignment (MA) have been mixed. This collaborative study combined raw data from RCTs, aiming to compare functional outcomes between KA using patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and MA, and whether any patient subgroups may benefit more from KA technique.
Citation:
Outcome of kinematic alignment using patient-specific instrumentation versus mechanical alignment in TKA: a meta-analysis and subgroup analysis of randomised trials. 2018 138(9):1293-1303. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Publisher:
Springer
Journal:
Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
Issue Date:
30-Jun-2018
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/11287/620759
DOI:
10.1007/s00402-018-2988-8
PubMed ID:
29961093
Additional Links:
https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2988-8
Type:
Journal Article
Language:
en
ISSN:
1434-3916
Appears in Collections:
Exeter Knee Reconstruction Unit (EKRU); 2018 RD&E publications

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorWoon, J T Ken
dc.contributor.authorZeng, I S Len
dc.contributor.authorCalliess, Ten
dc.contributor.authorWindhagen, Hen
dc.contributor.authorEttinger, Men
dc.contributor.authorWaterson, Hugh B.en
dc.contributor.authorToms, Andrewen
dc.contributor.authorYoung, S Wen
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-11T13:35:22Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-11T13:35:22Z-
dc.date.issued2018-06-30-
dc.identifier.citationOutcome of kinematic alignment using patient-specific instrumentation versus mechanical alignment in TKA: a meta-analysis and subgroup analysis of randomised trials. 2018 138(9):1293-1303. Arch Orthop Trauma Surgen
dc.identifier.issn1434-3916-
dc.identifier.pmid29961093-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00402-018-2988-8-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11287/620759-
dc.description.abstractKinematic alignment (KA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) matches component position to the pre-arthritic anatomy of an individual patient, with the aim of improving functional outcomes. Recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing KA to traditional neutral mechanical alignment (MA) have been mixed. This collaborative study combined raw data from RCTs, aiming to compare functional outcomes between KA using patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and MA, and whether any patient subgroups may benefit more from KA technique.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.relation.urlhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2988-8en
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgeryen
dc.subjectWessex Classification Subject Headings::Orthopaedicsen
dc.titleOutcome of kinematic alignment using patient-specific instrumentation versus mechanical alignment in TKA: a meta-analysis and subgroup analysis of randomised trials.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journalArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgeryen
dc.type.versionIn press (epub ahead of print)en

Related articles on PubMed

All Items in RD&E Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.